X

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Reveal Trailer

Posted: May 23, 2011
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 Reveal Trailer
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/53043/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3-reveal-trailer/
http://images.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/270498_LGST/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3.jpg
Video_53043
The will of a single man can bring the world to its knees. The will of a single soldier may be all that stands from its crumbling into chaos. Watch this Modern Warfare 3 trailer, with in-game footage, and prepare for a bigger, bolder war.

Comments are Closed

  • Wesdog777

    Im sure it will be better then black ops

    Posted: May 25, 2011 9:50 PM
    Wesdog777
  • fab186

    meh. I'm really losing interest in mindless shooters that focus on the multiplayer. I'll probably buy it just to finish the fricken cliffhanger from MW2

    Posted: May 25, 2011 9:13 PM
    fab186
  • OSTBY18

    im gonna get this and BF3 im gonna now say three things i dislike and three things i like about both franchises

    COD Pros-
    Fast paced action online
    Has survival mode
    Campaign is action packed and mysterious

    COD Cons-
    Boosters and some bad things wrong with multiplayer
    More hackers than most other Online games
    Short campaign

    BF Pros-
    Big maps online
    Lots of destruction online
    Very realistic gameplay

    BF Cons-
    More lagging issues than other Online games
    Lots of snipers online
    Small selection of perks and weapons

    Overall BF3 and MW3 both look intriguing to me so we just gotta check em out!!!

    Posted: May 25, 2011 7:44 PM
    OSTBY18
  • AngelofRevival

    I'm not buying anymore DLC from Activion. They charge too much for it. (Sixty dollars? No thanks.) Besides, I'll still be busy with Gears 3 by that time.

    Posted: May 25, 2011 2:32 PM
    AngelofRevival
  • GFH_14

    does osama bin laden comes out in this game?

    Posted: May 25, 2011 2:25 PM
  • Bipolar-Sniper

    I don't even get cod games for single player ... it is tooooo short .. i play multi-player ...plz no nuke ....DO NOT BRING BACK THE NUKE ....boosters ruined that game

    Posted: May 25, 2011 2:24 PM
  • yuseieric

    wtf, Stop complainin about COD-_______- Juss dont get it, Nobody is forcing you!

    Posted: May 25, 2011 2:05 PM
    yuseieric
  • Lacking_Fractal

    This time I am renting it instead of paying $60 for half a campaign and broken multiplayer.

    Posted: May 25, 2011 12:21 PM
    Lacking_Fractal
  • killzone1907

    i just peed on my self that is :o i will sell my moms stuff for that game

    Posted: May 25, 2011 12:11 PM
    killzone1907
  • killzone1907

    i just peed on my self that is :o i will sell my moms stuff for that game

    Posted: May 25, 2011 12:09 PM
    killzone1907
  • cthomas33619

    ok color me impressed

    Posted: May 25, 2011 10:04 AM
  • lilshortkid16

    AWESOME!!!!!!!!! LIKE IT ON FACEBOOK @CALL OF DUTY MODERN WARFARE 3

    Posted: May 25, 2011 7:32 AM
  • EarstotheGround

    MW3:

    Pros:
    - the trailer shows 'promise' of an engaging single player campaign

    Cons:
    - same old graphics engine and 'on a rail' gameplay characteristics
    - lack of realistic destructive environments
    - no open world play or vehicular combat
    - Multiplayer will likely be another small 'sand-box' with crack heads running around shooting anything that moves

    This is only the first trailer, so I'll reserve judgement until I see more gameplay (campaign and MP), but BF3 still seems to have the edge imo

    Posted: May 25, 2011 7:24 AM
    EarstotheGround
  • Stu_Ark

    Single player is all these games are good for, and it looks like they've worked on theirs, aparently making it longer and better. Still confused about them releaseing a modern warfare title, thought they wernt allowed without the original infinity ward lead designers consent.

    Posted: May 25, 2011 5:47 AM
  • NekoRyushi

    just to put it out there again....no matter what people thinks.....i will buy this game..

    Posted: May 25, 2011 12:52 AM
    NekoRyushi
  • LezSamurai

    It's going to be the same formula.

    Singleplayer: Enemies spawn relentlessly until you hit some magic invisible checkpoint or you get dragged passed them all through un-ending, on-rails sections (no need to pull the trigger here). Throw in the worst "story" you can imagine and $100,000,000 worth of crappy voice acting from celebrity douche-bags of the moment (which will probably raise the price to $200,..... before they decide to charge you another $45 for reused maps from singleplayer).

    Multiplayer: You run around in circles on un-inspired horribly designed ugly maps shooting people in the back 50-75% of the time while every button you press levels you up and grants you another attachment for your swiss-army knife/gun.

    FACT: THIS DOES NOT A GOOD GAME MAKE!

    ADVICE: DO NOT BUY! IT WILL MAKE COD BETTER! ACTIVISION IS GETTING LAZY!

    Posted: May 24, 2011 11:06 PM
    LezSamurai
  • remshaw

    as long as thay make Germany an ally of America. Russa and Germany still HATE oneanother. {is that one word or two?} Ever since WW2 those countrys want the other to burn in hell.

    Posted: May 24, 2011 10:46 PM
    remshaw
  • Fusion13

    Judging by the comments, lots of people will be going from MW3 to BF3. Somehow I see the numbers of sales going against that. Is this really the year where people don't by the new COD? I really want to know, Thumbs up if you are still gonna buy it thumbs down if you really are done with COD.

    Posted: May 24, 2011 10:10 PM
    Fusion13
  • gillybud420

    HOLLY !@#$ LOOKS AWESOME

    Posted: May 24, 2011 9:39 PM
  • dalmascus

    MW 1-2 had a "decent"story and ii think the new one might have merit in narritive but crap in length an detail. battlefield......Bad company one's story was grat, well writen but bad Co 2 story was lacking in my opinion
    and i agree with conDAWG PS. i can never "reply" to anything anyone says, am i doing somthing wrong cuz i can only comment

    Posted: May 24, 2011 8:40 PM
    dalmascus
AdChoices