X

Adam and Morgan Discuss Killzone 3

Posted: July 7, 2010
Adam and Morgan Discuss Killzone 3
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/47309/adam-and-morgan-discuss-killzone-3/
http://images.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/244648_LGST/xp20100707_killzone3_dis.jpg
Video_47309
Adam Sessler and Morgan Webb discuss the upcoming PlayStation 3 exclusive game Killzone 3. Find out what they think about Killzone 3, the game's PlayStation Move integration, its 3D gameplay, Jet Packs and more in this Preview Discussion about Killzone 3.

Comments are Closed

  • Hr.Glas

    No one is forcing us to view 3D. They just wanted us to have the option. Its also capable of using the Move. But we dont have to. Not many people have a 3D tv but if by chance you do, wont you be glad that this awesome game is in 3D and you get to actually use the tv you spent your money on. Most of all, there seems to be no sacrafice of gameplay or graphics to this game, having been made in 3D and with move support.

    Posted: September 4, 2010 4:51 PM
    Hr.Glas
  • Dorby5826

    I agree with Adam and Morgan, 3D is a cool feature, but I do not really care a whole lot about it to go out and buy a 3D tv. I am looking forward to this game so much. I am also looking forward to Halo Reach since they mentioned the game in the video.

    Posted: August 27, 2010 12:24 PM
    Dorby5826
  • mp1289

    nobody has 3d tvs right now, because they were just released this summer. who will have a 3d tv in feb 2011? is the correct question. Nobody is making you play killzone in 3d and the graphics have not been effected. this temper reminds me of the killzone 2 review though. you guys need to appreciate all games, not just heavenly sword action figures and antidepressants.

    Posted: July 23, 2010 8:44 PM
    mp1289
  • drangel_jam

    What I hate about the 3D TVs is that the tech is still very expensive for the consumer. Almost $200 per glasses, really? So a family of four spends $800 on the glasses alone? Not to mention the exorbitant prices of the TVs.

    Then again, we are going to need better magic than Nintendo's 3DS for 3DTVs with no glasses cause it seams 3DS' 3D only work with the main user and you have to be looking straight at it.

    Posted: July 8, 2010 9:09 AM
    drangel_jam
  • Shikai10

    Does having a HD 3D Projector count? I guess it would if I didn't have to shell out an additional 150 bones for each person viewing on those damn expensive NVDIA 3D Glasses :( Gimme some 3D tech without the glasses people!

    Posted: July 8, 2010 8:44 AM
    Shikai10
  • Cmac4

    I agree... i mean how many people actually have a 3D TV i mean hey... if i had the money i would most likely have one but i dont so i dont : / who knows maybe in 5 or so years 3D will be standard like HD is now.

    Posted: July 7, 2010 8:18 PM
    Cmac4
  • hellfirestrike

    How long will this exhausting campaign for 3D last? Few people are interested and even fewer own a television capable of utilizing it. Has Sony put so much revenue behind it that they have no other choice but to shove 3D down our throats?

    Posted: July 7, 2010 6:25 PM
    hellfirestrike
AdChoices