Displaying 41–60 of 158
There was very little difference in the cutscenes, other than the fact that the PS3 version has more vibrant colors. When it switches to realtime rendering is where the real difference can be seen. Look closely at the hair and notice that the girls hair seems as if their is no anti-aliasing in effect for the 360 version while the PS3 version seems much smoother. When you look at the guys legs when he falls to the ground, there seems to be more polygons on the PS3 version than the 360 version.Overall, I am very surprised in both games quality. I'm looking forward to picking this title up.
omg i just saw the end part the gameplay is beutiful ive never been a final fantasy fan but ill find time to rent this
omg this is amazing lloking but im broke and i know that the game isnt like this id wanna play an fps or a tps like that
1 is lighter 1 is darket it looks awesome put together
Looked the same to me. Most of the time I could hardly tell there was a line down the middle.
The different is so small u cant really tell. Just buy the game 4 whatever system u have
the funny part is that usually ps3 games are darker and smooth while xbox games are usually bright and crisp. lighting is lighting i dont know why they would not turn up the gamma on the xbox.
http://www.lensoftruth.com/?p= 18555All you need to know about their differences and not through some crappy streaming video.
shame the sync is of by a milli second or 2 as it would show how similar they are, but top job to the people who ported it from one unit to the other (I'm assuming it was PS3 ported to 360) they have done their job well, atleast for the cut scene don' know if there is a difference in loading times, that's probably what will do it for me in the long run, but at the moment the one disc sell is winning out.Mind you I assuming the more bravoitic people will go xbox to increase their peni score, PS3 trophy just don't feel as satisfying.
After watching the clip there is very little difference to the two versions. To my eye the PS3 version was slightly more colorfull but at times the 360 version seemed to have a little more detail. Sometimes it is hard to tell because the two screens don't line up well all the time.I agree with most people that the version that people will buy will be determined by weither or not thay mind switching disks, or weither or not they are blind fan boys or not.
wow i didn't really think i would see a difference but on HD it looks Clearer on the PS3 side and the 360 side looks darker and a little more hazy but in the end it looks like a great game can't wait but i have god of war to wait for too man way too many good games
I wonder why Sony put Blu-ray into there systems and the great XBOX put in HD. I am curious as to why Microsoft put dying technology into there system.
Who cares? Everyone knows that the PS3 is a better consol, naturally the game is going to look better on the PS3!
framerate is faster on ps3 so i gatta say it does indeed look better on the ps3 sorry xbox 360 i think u might need an upgrade
test. The real TEST will be.
Looks darker on the 360 then the PS3 but really the real will be in the game play which you elected not to show for some dumb ass reason.
sorry for being anti sony on my first post it's just i am tired of Sony never doing anything original like MS saw the idea of online and changed it and made it better and with the motion controller they didn't just copy and do the same thing they changed it enough to make it a new experience of playing by having no controllers and be truly motion based. I go to a school called UAT and they make you think of innovated indeas and by changing a current invention or idea and making it your own. Which i see MS does and Nintendo has pretty much every innovation in video games with analog, D-pad, ABXY buttons, shoulder buttons, 3D platforming, motion controller etc... then you have xbox with the xbox live, including marketplace arcade, netflix, acheievements, HD visuals on the first gen Xbox, Natal, etc... so what has sony done that was unique and different? plus what happened last night at the FF13 launch party was uncalled for and inexcusable with this quote, taken from joystiq.com:"The evening escalated to quite possibly one of the most awkward toasts we've ever encountered. A Microsoft spokesperson took the stage, congratulating Square Enix on bringing Final Fantasy XIII to Xbox 360. Shortly thereafter, a Sony spokesperson also took the stage, emphasizing how Final Fantasy is a PlayStation franchise, and how XIII is best on PS3, on a single Blu-ray disc -- the way it was meant to be played."among tons of other arrogant remarks they seem to always make. so i know i wil upset Sony fanboys but i am just mad because i grew up in the 80's when Sony was king and now their quality is crap and being #1 with the PS1 & PS2 they need to fail to be humbled just like Nintendo was and now look at them.Just wanted to clarify myself and show my reasonings :-)
Okay i have a 360 and really the PS3 version is more vibrant, any one who says that the reason the PS3 version is better cause the 360 is on 3 discs does not have a valid point, both games are absolutely phenomenal. Sure the game was for the longest time a Sony exclusive but that doesn't matter, and anybody who wants to argue about that reason is being idiotic. Its a great title and obviously its going to look better on the PS3. but gameplay is the same, and for those who are complaining about the three discs, stop it cause its not that difficult to change a disc.
Seems the same to me, just the ps3 and 360 have different light contrasts that's about it, but the game looks AMAZING!
Posted: February 14, 2012
20,832 Views | 03:46
Posted: April 18, 2011
31,342 Views | 01:06
Posted: April 1, 2011
19,207 Views | 01:23
Posted: December 14, 2010
12,344 Views | 01:54
Posted: November 24, 2010
33,316 Views | 02:46
© 2012 G4 Media, LLC. All rights reserved.