X

MAG Public Beta Direct-Feed Gameplay Footage

Posted: January 8, 2010
MAG Public Beta Direct-Feed Gameplay Footage
http://www.g4tv.com/videos/43634/mag-public-beta-direct-feed-gameplay-footage/
http://images.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/186806_LGST/mag.jpg
Video_43634
Zipper Interactive and Sony kick off the open beta to the public masses. Have you had your chance to take on the largest online multiplayer shooter experience ever!?!?

Games in this Video:

MAG (PlayStation 3)

Comments are Closed

  • MAG_Ninja

    great game so good i named my own user MAG

    Posted: April 23, 2010 7:53 PM
    MAG_Ninja
  • Big_red42

    Dear mknauer
    I am at a loss of words it seems. I can't understand why you would play the beta considering you obviously had a good degree of bias against this game. Why pay the 60$ if you were to hate it anyway? you do understand that controlling an actual battlefield requires direction and understanding of you're opponents maneuvers do you not? Treating every FPS the same is like comparing Dracula to Twilight. If you want to kill people with guns I suggest you stick with modern warfare 2 if you want a more community oriented FPS experience I think this game can supply.

    Posted: January 27, 2010 11:11 PM
    Big_red42
  • mknauer

    There's nothing revolutionary about this game. I remember when Battlefield 2 came out for the PC and i couldn't stop talking about it. This seems like all it is, is a 256 player FPS with big maps to hide and camp in. I don't know how the real game is going to be, but the beta version that I played didnt excite me at all. I'll wait and see how the reviews are, my guess is that x-play gives it a 3 at best, based on what I've seen with the beta. I'll stick to COD6 for now for my consule FPS fix, and CSS for my PC FPS fix. Also in general, where are all the New Revolutionary break through games been? Ex: Battlefield 2, World of Warcraft, Half life, ect... Something that comes out and just says wow, I've never played a game like this before!

    Posted: January 26, 2010 7:35 PM
    mknauer
  • eplrsjoe

    Joint Operations for pc about 2004 was 250 players and was awesome huge beutifull maps, helicopters that were easy to fly and other vehicles to get around. If this game is anything like that it would be awesome. I dont have a ps3 or will get one but this makes for real war instead of run and gun.

    Posted: January 12, 2010 7:19 AM
    eplrsjoe
  • Dynamo10

    This game isn't for everyone. I played the beta and at first i thought it was crap, but after a while i started to see what was good about it and I really enjoyed it. That said I think I'll stick to MW2 like the noob I am.

    Posted: January 12, 2010 5:08 AM
    Dynamo10
  • yorkey27

    i thing this game will be good the next time arond battlefield bc 2
    is going to better game for you money so im going to wait

    Posted: January 11, 2010 11:44 PM
    yorkey27
  • heltonhammer

    It grows on you after a short amount of time. After getting enough skills points to get the better scope, force grip and a few other perks, the shooter is tons better. It impressed me.

    And by the way, anyone expecting to have 30 people shooting at you at once, you've been expecting something it's not.

    Officially speaking, MAG is not an FPS. It's an MMOFPS. Meaning it's large scale and includes separate objectives. I actually enjoyed it, especially after reaching the 256 players. The size of the battle makes killing that one guy planting the game-ending bomb THAT MUCH BETTER! You are one out of 256 soldiers that changed the tide of battle, and you feel it when you play.

    Bottom line is, this game is not MW2 by the hundreds. It's pretty different in some cases. Especially since you gain leadership roles.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 8:03 PM
    heltonhammer
  • SgtPepper09

    Team Fortress 2 meets Modern warfare, I was hoping that this game convinced me to buy a PS3

    Posted: January 11, 2010 7:40 PM
    SgtPepper09
  • boohoodman

    don't compare this to modern warfare 2 because it isnt and its not trying to be

    Posted: January 11, 2010 3:35 PM
    boohoodman
  • MarshmallowPies

    The weapon and character models are horrendous.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 3:25 PM
    MarshmallowPies
  • kkey00

    just sounds to me it's a combo of MW2 and Battlefield 2...which have already been done before.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 3:20 PM
    kkey00
  • nodrodee

    My issue is you seem to only be able to play in random matches, no clan battles, you can group up but can't decide who your going to play against.
    Graphics not great not real bad, about level of Halo 3.

    One thing to keep in mind is this game seems like it going to have a larger learning curve then most online shooters, not like Modern Warfare type where you just jump in and run agun and you will get by. Seems to require tacktics to get objectives and it takes awhile to figure out what all works.

    Like Socom, if you just jump in a play to try it out you not going to like it as much, but when you learn how people play and tatics it gets a lot better. Game will be best when you have 5 in a squad that are friends and will work together. Like SOCOM, I can't even play without my clan anymore.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 11:54 AM
    nodrodee
  • ralph1628

    I'm picking this one up. There will be updates of course. It has a charm of it's own.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 11:37 AM
    ralph1628
  • sick111one

    This game is awesome. Most n00by MW2 players don't like it because they have to use teamwork and strategy.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 10:54 AM
  • JOKERNJ732

    as a owner of both ps3 and 360 i must say this game looks like a huge pile of crap. modern warfare 2 for 360 is the best shooter around and will be until treyarch releases there cod title in november. the graphics in mag suck the guns look retarted and animations are "blocky". On that note ps3 pretty much bites the big one overall. all games that are on both consoles are better for 360.just look at bayonetta. the only ps3 games i own are mlb the show uncharted 2 ang mgs 4. thats it. ps3 has like 2 hits a year 360 all the way baby. they have like one some times 2 blockbusters a month.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 10:35 AM
    JOKERNJ732
  • SlayerRX23

    I had lots of fun on the beta. Zipper you did a great job!!! I can't wait for the release. The teamwork of the game is awesome. My only complaint is with the grouping. Sometimes my group didn't get put in together on the same squad. Once that's fixed I have no complaints at all.

    To everyone that understands this isn't a MW2 game, THANK YOU!! If you are someone that can't get MW2 out of your head then stay there. Most of you are the ones that go running off on your own.

    I played as Squad leader and Platoon leader. That was so awesome!! I called in artillery and air strikes!! I almost got to OIC. Leading players that don't want to listen was always a pain. I had lots of fun though.

    See ya'll on the release!!

    Posted: January 11, 2010 10:28 AM
    SlayerRX23
  • Spacepope58

    I loved the Beta. we can argue about all the little things for hours and still get no where. The fact is the gameplay was fun, fast, and made you feel like you where in a large scale battle. again there are things to complain about most of my complaints were about unfair level design but even when you loose a match you still get awards and you still get to level up so I didn't care as much about winning as I did about having a good time in this large scale battle.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 9:47 AM
    Spacepope58
  • Gear200

    It doesnt look awful, but with the release date coming soon it has a few bugs to repair, lots of really bad animations and I didnt like how the parachuters were as stiff as boards, but don't forget it is only the beta.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 6:12 AM
    Gear200
  • XXXSpartan118XXX

    Isnt this coming out later this month? Why does it still look buggy, the weapons sound like plastic ad its lacking anything special besides size. Another great idea and SONY happens to screw it up yet again.

    Posted: January 11, 2010 5:56 AM
    XXXSpartan118XXX
  • Sabian187

    ehhh 256 good. Graphics from what i've seen so far. Bad

    Posted: January 11, 2010 4:43 AM
    Sabian187
AdChoices