
Anonymous, the hacker initiative, is fighting back by denying responsiblity for the PlayStation Network outage after Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai hinted the group may be behind the PSN's massive security breach. Hirai addressed the U.S. House Of Representatives on Wednesday to discuss the ongoing PSN hack and threat on American data theft.
In a letter that was released to the public, Hirai mentioned that a file had been planted in the PSN containing the words "We Are Legion" which is part of Anonymous' slogan.
Anonymous previously released a statement saying "For Once We Didn't Do It" on April 22 after people started to suspect their involvment in the PSN outage. Now, they're once again denying they had anything to do with the PSN Outage. In a statement, Anonymous raises a handful of points:
- Anonymous has never been known to engage in credit card theft
- Many of the people Anonymous has worked against in the past has been known to have lied to the public about them. "There is no corporation in existence that will choose the truth when lies are more conveninent."
- Anonymous allows reporters in to their operating channels to see their work.
- Whoever did perform the credit card theft on the PSN did so contrary to Anonymous' beliefs and intentions.
The statement goes in to great detail around the reasons that Anonymous isn't responsible for the PSN security breach and makes it perfectly clear, saying, "If a legitimate and honest investigation into the credit card [data theft] is conducted, Anonymous will not be found liable. While we are a distributed and decentralized group, our "leadership" does not condone credit card theft. To see the full statement read after the break.
Last month, an unknown party managed to break into Sony's servers and acquired millions of customer records including credit card numbers. Insomuch as that this incident occurred in the midst of Anonymous' OpSony, by which participants engaged in several of our standard information war procedures against the corporation and its executives, Sony and other parties have come to blame Anonymous for the heist. Today, in a letter directed to members of Congress involved in an inquiry into the situation, Sony claimed to have discovered a file on its servers, presumably left by the thieves in question, entitled "Anonymous" and containing a fragment of our slogan, "We are Legion". In response, we would like to raise the following points:
1. Anonymous has never been known to have engaged in credit card theft.
2. Many of our corporate and governmental adversaries, on the other hand, have been known to have lied to the public about Anonymous and about their own activities. HBGary, for instance, was caught lying a number of times to the press, to the public, and to Anonymous itself (in this phone call, for instance), CEO Aaron Barr makes a number of untrue statements regarding the intent of his "research", claiming for instance that he never tried to sell the information to the FBI when emails acquired soon showed that he had been set to do just that; executive Karen Burke was also caught lying to Bloomberg about having not seen an incriminating email that she had in fact replied to just a few days before]. The US Chamber of Commerce lied about not having seen the criminal proposal created by them for Team Themis; Palantir lied about not having any idea what their employees were up to; Berico publicly denounced a plan that they had actively engaged in creating; etc. There is no corporation in existence will choose the truth when lies are more convenient.
3. To the contrary, Anonymous is an ironically transparent movement that allows reporters in to our operating channels to observe us at work and which has been extraordinarily candid with the press when commenting on our own activities, which is why reporters prefer no talk to us for truthful accounts of the situation rather than fallacious public relations departments of our targets.
4. In the realm of criminal investigation, there is an important aspect of investigations that should never be overlooked. The "modus operandi" of a criminal rarely changes. Whoever did perform the credit card theft did so contrary to the "modus operandi" and intentions of Anonymous. Public support is not gained by stealing credit card info and personal identities, we are trying to fight criminal activities by corporations and governments, not steal credit cards.
5. It should be remembered that several federal contractors such as HBGary and Palantir have been caught planning a variety of unethical and potentially criminal conspiracies by which to discredit the enemies of their clients. This is not a theory - this is a fact that has been reported at great length by dozens of journalists with major publications. Insomuch as that our enemies have either engaged in or planned to engage in false flag efforts, it should not be surprising that mangy of the journalists who have covered us, who know who we are and what motives us - and who have alternatively seen the monstrous behavior of those large and "respectable" firms that are all too happy to throw aside common decency at the behest of such clients as Bank of America and the US Chamber of Commerce - also have their suspicious that some capable party performed this operation as a means by which to do great damage to Anonymous in the public eye. Those who consider such a prospect to be somehow unlikely are advised to read about what was proposed by Team Themis in their efforts to destroy Wikileaks, and should otherwise take a few minutes to learn about COINTELPRO and other admitted practices by the US intelligence community. The fact is that Anonymous has brought a great deal of discomfort to powerful entities such as Booz Allen Hamilton, Palantir, and much of the federal government; the Justice Department in particular is likely happy that our efforts revealed that it was they themselves who recommended the now-discredited "law firm" Hunton & Williams to Bank of America in order that the latter might better be able to fight back against Wikileaks. Al of this is now public record, and those or other entities may have again engaged in unsavory tactics that they are known to have engaged in in the past.
If a legitimate and honest investigation into the credit card is conducted, Anonymous will not be found liable. While we are a distributed and decentralized group, our "leadership" does not condone credit card theft. We are concerned with erosion of privacy and fair use, the spread of corporate feudalism, the abuse of power and the justifications of executives and leaders who believe themselves immune personally and financially for the actions they undertake in the name of corporations and public office.
Anunymous will continue its work in support of transparency and individual liberty; our adversaries will continue their work in support of secrecy and control. The FBI will continue to investigate us for crimes of civil disobedience while continuing to ignore the crimes planned by major corporations which use their services.
We do not forgive, even if others forgive our enemies for those things for which we are attacked.
We do not forget, even if others fail to remember.
We are legion, and will remain so no matter how many of our participants are raided by armed agents of a broken system.
We are Anonymous.
Expect us.
So now what? Sony is hinting the blame may rest on Anonymous, but Anonymous raises fair and valid points in their statement as well. What do you think about Anonymous' statement regarding Sony's allegations? Is Sony trying to accuse Anon or did they simply find a mysterious file?
Source: The Guardian
Have something to share? You can find me on Twitter!




Comments are Closed
Comments
Displaying 41–60 of 71
212344
Scann3rz
My last post didnt go so if u see it sorry but we shouldnt be questioning whether they have a motive to hack sony but who has motive to frame Anonymous?
Falconer13
Hold on a second. They operate transparently, and they recently hammered Sony with a DDoS attack. Though Anonymous has an agenda that borders on the illegal, they do seem to operate with a sense of morals. They would be classified as "Grey Hat" hackers, people who do malicious hacking for no personal gain. What could have happened, is a "Black Hat" Hacker (a hacker who practices malicious hacking for personal gain) could have watched and replicated techniques utilized by Anonymous to get into Sony's already compromised servers and unleash his code. The Anonymous labeled file is a diversion, and possibly a way to eliminate competition or a means of detection, if not an outright plant by Sony and the various Private Security Firms they have hired to plug the holes in their infrastructure.
bladej4
im more interested when the psn is coming back on since its thursday already may 5th and nothing...
Scann3rz
Orrrrrrr. instead of charging anonymous we could "question" them as not who has the biggest grudge/ motive towards sony. but who has grudge/ motive to frame Anonymous. and if Anonymous is as truthful as they claim they should have no problem disclosing that information
scorpian876
I do believe "Anonymous'' is behind it,we are Legion means we are many,the more he deny's the more he's lying.And the "Elite Hackers " web sight doesn't help at all,a lot of the Hacking Tools where created by Micro soft,I think the F.C.C. should take down web sights down like that period.I just hope they catch these hackers who shut down Sony,I don't care what people say,Micro Soft stared the Hacking Tools,they should be held accountable for creating the hacking tools.
BrenLeahey
Maybe they did, maybe they didn't. All I have to say is that Sony needs to get its crap back together. I own a 360 and Microsoft doesn't seem to have a problem with people hacking their network. Sony, hire new security guys (or gals.)
latinoish_bwbhair
yeah like I said before, just a bunch a hacking marks; Anon is not robin hood. If i walk up to you and say; "stinking whore I'm gonna blast your head off and your mother...." ; but I don't do it. Yet another guy runs up to you and steals your purse and knifes you in your neck; am I a suspect? Yes-No?
Even if I only threaten or kill for the glory of hamas and never for personal profit? Or because you gave my brother herpes and cold sores and I would never steal your purse 'cause I'm rich or well off enough to get anything I need; or I do it only for an anti nazi movement or 'cause I like the adrenaline I get when i see your face turn from pink to white from the mean look in my face; and I would never actually shoot you; am I still on the suspect list?
Would your kin send the police after me or would they say aw no, not latinoish they only say mean stuff and kill for fun or to make a political point, they would never steal a purse so it wasn't them.....moron.
latinoish_bwbhair
yeah like I said before, just a bunch a hacking marks; Anon is not robin hood. If i walk up to you and say; "stinking whore I'm gonna blast your head off and your mother...." ; but I don't do it. Yet another guy runs up to you and steals your purse and knifes you in your neck; am I a suspect? Yes-No?
Even if I only threaten or kill for the glory of hamas and never for personal profit? Or because you gave my brother herpes and cold sores and I would never steal your purse 'cause I'm rich or well off enough to get anything I need; or I do it only for an anti nazi movement or 'cause I like the adrenaline I get when i see your face turn from pink to white from the mean look in my face; and I would never actually shoot you; am I still on the suspect list?
Would your kin send the police after me or would they say aw no, not latinoish they only say mean stuff and kill for fun or to make a political point, they would never steal a purse so it wasn't them.....moron.
latinoish_bwbhair
yeah like I said before, just a bunch a hacking marks; Anon is not robin hood. If i walk up to you and say; "stinking whore I'm gonna blast your head off and your mother...." ; but I don't do it. Yet another guy runs up to you and steals your purse and knifes you in your neck; am I a suspect? Yes-No?
Even if I only threaten or kill for the glory of hamas and never for personal profit? Or because you gave my brother herpes and cold sores and I would never steal your purse 'cause I'm rich or well off enough to get anything I need; or I do it only for an anti nazi movement or 'cause I like the adrenaline I get when i see your face turn from pink to white from the mean look in my face; and I would never actually shoot you; am I still on the suspect list?
Would your kin send the police after me or would they say aw no, not latinoish they only say mean stuff and kill for fun or to make a political point, they would never steal a purse so it wasn't them.....moron.
TheSlowFlash
Yeah, you are going down period. Even if this time you are innocent (I doubt that). I hope they track down every single member of Anon and destroy them. I do not need some neckbeard living in his mom's basement trying to force me to change my mind. I wanted Sony to hammer that dirty nerd George Hotz into the pavement. I CHOOSE to buy Sony products... If you don't like that you can't use Linux on the PS3 then F-U! I do not care about what YOU think, DO NOT BUY IT! Who the F do you think you are to effect me in any way whatsoever? I still want you clowns CRUSHED for the first pathetic attack on Sony you just did.
seanzilla
They have created a "society" of hackers whether they like it or not that can deflect any blame or attention from one person to the whole "society". Being anonymous in definition is easy (lacking individuality, unique character, or distinction) This will turn any cyber attack into the doing of anonymous, and all it takes is those three words "we are legion". To me if it looks like a rat, then its a rat.
darylcorey
I figure as I have from the word go this is someone using Anon's war declaration as a diversion for theft. Quite frankly though if the Anons suffer for it as an earlier poster said, you declare war you be prepared to take responsibility for what you, and what others do in your name.
FuzzofPekinopolis
Guilty by association?
Hackers do not want to be jumbled together in the same group as long as nothing bad is going on. When it's all good, everyone wants to take the credit. Heard this story many times before.
Don't be involved with this sort of thing in the first place. Allot harder to be implicated when something bad happens.
Maybe Annon should just go away all together. Cause if they stay, they have no reason to complain when asked to defend themselves.
And no, I don't care if you disagree with me.
Draco1919
Many of you are calling Anonymous thief's, liars, and criminals this astounds me! they are showing you the truth! risking their freedom to show you how corporations XXXX you over. And what do you guys do just forgot about it 2 minutes later haha. their work is an endless and pointless one because most of you are close minded freaks that cant see past the illusion of freedom and choice you are given, so i feel bad for them but at least they're trying respect for that. They did not do this if they were going to steal from someone they would steal from the banks! not the people they are trying to inform.
crazywes
All I care about is finding and sending the person that did this to jail for years
Ghost2190
So bringing the internet back to Egyptian citizens isn't worthwhile? Identifying a Sex offender to the police isn't worthwhile? supporting government transparency isn't worthwhile? Uncovering a government funded op that directly infringes on OUR rights isn't worthwhile? please explain to me why they are so bad. Didn't they stop attacking PSN (Which I'm Glad they did stop)
Farmhand21
Honestly at this point i just want the network to be back up. I feel like Sony just wants to have someone accountable so they can say, "Yeah we got hacked but we caught the bad guys!" sure it would be good for the suspect to be caught but at this point they should be putting the majority of their work into getting the network back up.
Doogless91
It could easily have been anonymous or an individual in their group. And quite possibly some other hacker taking advantage of the fued between sony and anonymous to distract them from who the real criminal is here
Murphdiver
anyone can be anonymous.... thats the whole point of being in anonymous. Of course there is a main circle of anons, but lets just say a rogue anon hacked on his own. Does that hold the anonymous group responsible, or just that individual? The problem with anonymous is that they cannot control members or tell their followers not to act on their own. There is no democracy in anonymous so there are rogues. They say they are legion and i believe that is true for the main group, but the rest are just a hinderance to anon's reputation.
cardinalsfan1122
Well since their aren't really registered members of anonymous they kind of just recruit anyone it could be done by anonymous and the "leaders" of anonymous might not even know. I think they did it, they have the motive the power and they think they can't be caught. ANd they lost alot of support when they attacked sony the first time, maybe they are switching to credit card theft for funds. But the other main suspect is GeoHotz but he doesn't have motive to frame anonymous because they supported him. Anonymous is still #1 suspect.
Displaying 41–60 of 71
212344