X

The Movie As Tutorial: Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time Review

sjohnson
71 Comments

Posted May 26, 2010 - By Stephen Johnson

How Much Prince Of Persia Being A Game Weighed On The Film's Director

Over the last decade or so, Hollywood movies have cannibalized just about every aspect of video games, whether it’s free-roaming cameras, huge boss-battle set-pieces or over-amped, bombastic action sequences, but formulaic action flick Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time manages to jack something you wouldn’t think a movie would ever touch: The tutorial.

Tutorial levels in games are a necessary evil, of use to those few people who have literally never played a game before and don’t know you look around with the right stick and move with the left. Prince of Persia treats its audience as if it has never seen a movie before, and must be led through the watching process slowly and laboriously.

Example: The scene where Jake Gylenhaal discovers the power of the Sands of Time of the title. He’s carrying a stolen dagger with a prominent red button on the top, (it looks a little like a PlayStation Move controller, actually). In the middle of a fight, Jake/Dastan presses the button, and, wham: Time goes backwards a few seconds. The audience buys this conceit instantly. It’s not complicated. But that isn’t enough for PoP director Mike Newell. He repeats the sequence of events again. Fine. Good. We get it. Then, Jake Gylenhall explains the powers of the dagger. “Did you just see that?” he asks. “I hit this button, and Time went backwards!” Then he repeats the thought. “Time totally went backwards! Whoa!” I expected him to turn to the audience and lecture us: “Does everyone get it? I hit the button and time goes backwards.”

The time-travel-dagger itself is an interesting game mechanic in Ubisoft’s 2003 Sands of Time game, but as the Macguffin at the center of a film, it doesn’t work that well. A device that can erase events makes for a fun game when you fall off a ledge and can reverse the mistake before you hit the lava, but in a movie, it makes an already light-weight plot utterly weightless. Who cares if someone dies when characters can just hit the mystical rewind button and bring them back?

Plotwise, it’s standard issue, dumb-summer movie story time: The Prince and his Brothers rule an empire, but are suckered by the most transparent political ploy in film history. The king's brother, a shaved and goateed Ben Kingsley as Nizam, plants some weapons to cause an invasion of an innocent, spiritual city. I’m honestly not sure if the revelation of Nizam's betrayal is meant to be a surprise or not: It’s telegraphed so blatantly by the movie’s earlier scenes – Kingsley practically twirls his mustache and cackles -- that when he turns out to be evil, everyone knew it was coming, even people who didn’t understand how the dagger works. Even people in other theaters, seeing different movies. Pro-tip for leaders of empires: Don’t trust royal advisors who look like Ming the Merciless from Flash Gordon.

Anyway, the Persians sack the peaceful city. Gemma Arterton meets Jake Gyllenhaal. The two handsome royals hate each other, fight over the magic dagger, begin to fall in love, lose the dagger, find the dagger again and otherwise move through a threadbare adventure plot toward a workaday showdown between Dastan and Nizam.

The plot only vaguely makes sense and the characters barely exist. In a game, you can get away with plot holes and stock characters, but here, since we’re not controlling the main character, we expect a little more than avatars moving from digital set piece to digital set piece.

The acting is fine -- Jake Gylenhall tries, and Ben Kingsley chews scenery -- but the characters are so empty, there’s nothing to grab onto here. Even the expensive special effects aren’t that special. They’re spotty. In some scenes, huge, sweeping vistas are created that seem utterly real, but in other scenes, simple animal effects look cheesy and fake.

Other than the tutorial, this movie takes little from the video game. The main character’s skill at jumping around is intact, as is the setting, but Prince of Persia is more heavily indebted to the adventure epics of the 1950s than the video game. The film works, fleetingly, when it takes the anything-goes vibe of those old sword and sandal flicks and mixes in the joy of the Prince’s Persian Parkour, but the movie is so dumbed down and over-explained, that even the nutty joy that might be derived from the Prince’s frantic motion is quickly deadened by an over-reliance on digital effects, stupid and shallow characters and a boring plot.

Gamers: This is not the video game movie you are looking for. While it does nothing to actively destroy the Prince of Persia game franchise, even as mindless summer time fare, Prince of Persia: Sands of Time is a failure. It's a little like The Mummy, without the heart and soul.

The Movie As Tutorial: Prince Of Persia: The Sands Of Time Review
http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/704980/the-movie-as-tutorial-prince-of-persia-the-sands-of-time-review/
http://files.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/235512_S/How-Much-Prince-Of-Persia-Being-A-Game-Weighed-On-The-Films-Director.jpg
BlogThread_704980

Comments are Closed

  • cpspoo

    Damn, SJ!! That was one scathing review! Have a saucer of cream, catty-man.

    Posted: May 28, 2010 1:46 PM
    cpspoo
  • TheOccultKidEnkidu

    I think we all go to these movies hoping that Someone got it right... And they never do, really. But then again, a 2 hour long movie can't exactly capture all the fun and excitement from a 20 hour game. (Unless they did a movie about Turtles in Time... wait.. they did already..I thought it was decent.)

    But we've all become a little nit-picky about Movie games and we doom them to be failures even when they are decent movies. So the day we have a video game movie that all gamers can appreciate may never come, but we Can look forward to a good try.

    PS: Is ANYONE going to pay to see the Resident Evil movie coming out? Or have we [gamers] decided to just point and laugh from a distance at this one?

    Posted: May 27, 2010 2:19 PM
  • tenaciousNIKA

    why have you guys stopped doing video reviews? If i wanted to read a review i'd go to gamespot, i just like the entertainment of the video reviews

    Posted: May 27, 2010 1:10 PM
    tenaciousNIKA
  • Nub Salad

    i figured it was fail when i first heard they casted jake as a persian.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 11:26 AM
    Nub+Salad
  • BONERJAM

    Everytime my friends or fiance see the trailers for this movie they say it looks terrible and I always say "that might be the case but this is videogames best chance at an ok movie, thus far". I'm thinking it will be pretty popular with kids.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 10:29 AM
    BONERJAM
  • NocturnalX

    "The red button there kid, don't ever, EVER touch the red button!"

    Posted: May 27, 2010 10:03 AM
    NocturnalX
  • User123123

    too long , also special effects looks cheap

    Posted: May 27, 2010 9:23 AM
    User123123
  • dino2100

    Hathor, I believe you are the idiot, Reviewers can do just as much good as they can harm.

    If you watch a movie that is part of a franchise or is advertised and promoted as something, then you expect it to live up to that something (note I have never played POP beyond a like five minute demo on some ps2 exclusive disk from looooooooooooooooooong ago). So of course if you watch Rambo you expect explosions (it's an established franchise) and of course if you watch Shawshank Redemption you will get a period piece with characterization. But the problem with your comparisons is that you KNOW what these things are going in.

    Arguably any Video game movie has been so far nothing but a profiteering streak, that rides off of a popular name to rake in a few extra dollars and anyone can call the hour and half steaming pile heading their way six months in advance when the trailer comes out. But are you aware of how these things may improve over time? Reviewers who speak their mind objectively about the content that is being shoveled out.

    Certainly not the MASSES who fork over the extra three dollars for DDD because it is hip and cool now. There are some reviewers who find it more simple to just say "yes i saw it and it was awesome", they are the problem; not all reviewers.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 6:51 AM
  • Kill Audio

    I agree with Hathur on this one. Sure movie stories need to be compelling but if you drift too far away from the plot in game, then it just has the name and not the story or anything related to it.

    Take Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within for example, that movie BUTCHERED the Final Fantasy name. I don't even know WHY they took that name to make that movie. But at least Prince of Persia stuck to somewhat of the games plot. Yeah it may not be EXACT, but let's face it, like prboi64 said, "You must know that game movies can't be targeted especially at gamers, it has to broaden it's viewers in order to make more money." This entirely true, if a game doesn't reach out to other viewers as well, most people won't even look its way, let alone watch it. And besides, most gamers (including G4) always have low expectations about turning a game into a movie because there has NEVER been a good and precise game-to-movie transition.

    I haven't even seen the movie yet but to me it's like most of you guys have been saying that it's your own opinion whether you will like it or not. G4 is more about video games, not movies. So don't take their opinion, take your own.

    And I hate critics to begin with. BUT I will say this......Prince of Persia (The game with Elika and "The Prince" with the light seeds) was the WORST game EVER.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 6:45 AM
    Kill+Audio
  • dino2100

    I knew it was crap when I heard they were turning it into a movie, I received confirmation however when the trailer played before Hot Tub Time Machine, that I saw recently. That scene with the boulder falling and sand swirling proved to look worse than something that was in my toilet... I actually crafted better art without effort, AMAZING.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 6:31 AM
  • Erroneous84

    When are they going to make a movie off of the game Pong? I would have paddle #1 be played by Ryan Reynolds and paddle #2 could be Shia Lebeouf... who could be the ball...

    Also when is the new Super Mario Brothers movie comin out??

    Posted: May 27, 2010 6:20 AM
    Erroneous84
  • hathur

    Reviewers are idiots... all of them. Game or video games.. they're all morons. Why? Easy.. they don't judge the item for what it is.

    When I watch "Rambo", I don't go in expecting plot, character development or even a cohesive story... I wanna see frackin stuff blow up and die... if it does that in a fun way, it's a good movie.

    When I watch "Shawshank Redemption", I go in hoping for a compelling drama with excellent characters and an intriguing story. I don't expect it to provide comedy, action, or special effects.

    When I watch Indiana Jones, I go in hoping for a high spirited, jovial crazy adventure with exciting locales, wacky and fun characters. I don't go in expecting a gripping plot or emotionally moving drama.

    When I watch a comedy, I don't expect action or even much of a plot... I only care if it's funny.. that's it.

    So why do reviewers always judge movies (and games) on things that don't even matter?

    I sure as hell ain't playing Civilization 4 currently for it's "compelling story" or "exciting action!" ... I play it because it makes me think and focus, much like chess.

    So why would you go into a Prince of Persia movie and expect an interesting plot or even richly detailed character development? Have you even played Prince of Persia games? They're light on plot and characters and heavy on adventure... you know, platforming, action, puzzles.

    If I were to watch this movie I would only expect and care whether or not it was a fun adventure to watch, with some decent action scenes.

    Do you play Mario Bros. for it's legendary "story" ? I should think not.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 5:38 AM
    hathur
  • littleb242

    first of all since disny made this movie the target audience are teens and the parents i bet they put just enough one liners and and hidden sex jokes to keep the parents happy and alot of action and hot girls to give the teens something to rub one out to when they get home.

    Posted: May 27, 2010 5:27 AM
    littleb242
  • SithLord1985

    I'm still gonna see it, but this review dampens my hopes for it

    Posted: May 27, 2010 5:12 AM
  • M_Dub35

    And for all that is good in the world...can somebody tell me which Mummy movie had heart and soul?!?...this coming from a guy who probly considers clipping his toe nails while watching paint dry a fun evening!!

    Posted: May 26, 2010 11:37 PM
  • M_Dub35

    I'm just curious ...when did one guy writing a review become the end all be all to forming your own opinion?!?!...granted video game to movie translations havent been that good but good grief people....MAKE UP YOUR OWN MINDS!!!. most of you that are saying that "I knew it"...or " thats a shock"...never intended to go see it anyway!!...it all boils down to this people..when G4 reviews games do we just say "oh well"? of course not, and lets not forget how G4 has rated some games on here....go see it for yourself!!

    Posted: May 26, 2010 11:29 PM
  • HomerKong

    U got 2 remember something....this is the same GUY who directed "Donnie Brasco" and freaking englishman directing a "Italian Mob Movie". Seriously can't the studio and producers find a director that has love for the source materail to keep it true. I understand that a movie version of a book or game are not going 2 be word 4 word. That's when games like God of War, Halo, Metal Gear Solid are said 2 b in development it makes me nervous, these are games that are sacred 2 us gamers that hold a special place in our hearts, and 2 have some come in and butcher them is wrong! Seriously Hollywood if u want 2 start making great video game movies bring in people who have passion 4 the game, from studio, the director, producer and right down the line! NO Brett Ratner or McG PLEASE!

    Posted: May 26, 2010 10:23 PM
    HomerKong
  • Boogie1188

    I just don't see how the movie fails when the creator of the franchise worked on it.

    Posted: May 26, 2010 9:54 PM
    Boogie1188
  • Trueblood6f2

    I cant wait for the world of warcraft movie to come out and extremely blow. Maybe if the halo movie wasn't scrapped then that one could blow as well. Its a movie for enjoyment not for nit picking. I'll probably see it in theaters for its entertainment value and not for what it "doesn't" have. I swear trolls and movie critics are what make good movies; bad. And possibly lose what money it could have made on opening week. Do yourself a favor people don't listen to critics. Be your own critic for you're own tastes. If critics keep thinking for us then where is the enjoyment in seeing a movie at?

    Posted: May 26, 2010 9:31 PM
    Trueblood6f2
  • Hazerdhat

    I dont think G4 likes any movies. I love you G4 but I think if a movie is not aimed towards a nerdy audience then you automaticly declare it bad. It is a summer movie that is aimed towards everyone and wont be inclined towards that audience. So I will listen to you guys on video games because that is what you specialize in, but nothing else since you guys probably have no idea what you are talking about. I swear if you guys like the "world of warcraft" movie then that is proof.

    Posted: May 26, 2010 8:21 PM
    Hazerdhat

ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Tags

g4tv.com
  • Solidoodle 2 3D Printer

    Posted: June 21, 2012

    146,627 Views | 03:14

  • International Sexy Ladies Show: Messy Cat Fight

    Posted: January 27, 2010

    427,375 Views | 00:49

  • Sara Underwood's Naked Bike Ride

    Posted: June 22, 2011

    1,024,805 Views | 05:20

  • International Sexy Ladies Show: Staircase To Heaven

    Posted: January 22, 2010

    312,084 Views | 00:42

  • X-Plays Says A Final Goodbye

    Posted: January 23, 2013

    88,932 Views | 06:45

AdChoices