
Sledgehammer Games is currently working on a Call of Duty game for Activision that is supposedly going to be a departure from the traditional first-person shooter genre. (Previous job listings indicate the game will most likely be a third-person shooter.) It’s tempting to think, then, that the long-rumored (and by all accounts, inevitable) “subscription” model that Activision has likely been considering for future COD games could in fact play a major part in whatever Sledgehammer is developing.
But as Activision Blizzard senior vice president of worldwide studios Brian Ward explained during today’s LA Games Conference, if this is happening, it won’t be up and running anytime soon.
“Those guys are still ramping up their team. So I think this is more contingent on the work that the guys at Treyarch are doing, and then there are some other pieces of it that some other vendors are working on. And I think I said ‘online’ not ‘subscription,’ because that’s one of the debates. How does this all fit together business model-wise. Is there a subscription? Is there not a subscription?”
Clearly, Activision has a lot to figure out in terms of what a possible subscription model might in fact look like for a Call of Duty game, and getting all of the development pieces together is one of their primary concerns at this point.
“I think there’s a lot of churn on who’s doing what right now with the people we’ve got all across…Treyarch, Sledgehammer, there are some guys left over from Underground Games, there’s the guys at Infinity Ward, and there were some other bits and pieces in it. So I think there are still a lot of assignments to figure out,” said Ward.
However, Activision better figure at least part of it out fast, because, as Ward explained, he expects Activision to roll out their plans for the new online model in the coming months.
“I think for sure by E3. I haven’t been told that’s the case, but I’m just guessing that by the time we get to E3 being in June as it is and Call of Duty 7 coming out in November…There will be a Call of Duty story at E3 for sure, even if it was just a single player game, there’d be a Call of Duty story. So I think that’s when probably in my estimation, and I’m not privy to the actual communication plan, but that’s when I would expect it.”
With so many various entities contributing to the overall Call of Duty brand, it seems natural that consolidation could be in the cards somewhere down the line. But as Ward points out:
“I really couldn’t say. First of all, I think that’s too big of an employee base to be under one unit, especially in a bunch of disparate locations. You know and frankly the Call of Duty business unit was only formed six weeks ago, so I think they need some time to get their feet under them, and there have been a lot of moving pieces in the past few weeks. So I think the business unit really needs time to solidify their plan.”
Ward and analyst Michael Pachter also shared their thoughts on the Bungie/Activision partnership that was announced today, and you can find that conversation right here.
Should the need arise, feel free to E-Mail me your tips, suggestions, and/or personal philosophies, or follow me on Twitter.




Comments are Closed
Comments
Displaying 21–32 of 32
112
imDraxx
I Stopped buying COD after the first MW title, but does Activision really think that turning the FPS into a 3rd person shooter will get more sales? May get attraction of those who favor 3rd person shooters but I see this as twisting the knife that stabbed COD in the heart.
tsan104
Activision Exec 1: Hey, people really seem to love these Call of Duty games.
Activision Exec 2: Hmm, I bet we can get them to buy pretty much anything as long as we slap Call of Duty on it.
Activision Exec 1: LOL. We might even be able to convince them into some sort of subscription fee.
LarcenousLaugh
Activision is really treading on dangerous ground with the idea of subscriptions, especially when one of their main marketplaces is a subscription based service like Xbox Live (which itself is used on an IPs subscription service). The quality of such a game would have to not only be top notch, but the support and updates would need to flow at a much faster clip then even most MMOs. With all the bad blood surrounding everything they do, alll it would take is another developer *cough*DICE*cough *cough*Respawn*cough* *hack*EA*cough* coming up with something only marginally competitive, but free, and people would switch in droves. They are banking a lot on a name (CoD) that as of right now, is doing it's best to impersonate the Hindenburgh.
ProjektX13
You can kiss my ass if you think that I am going to pay a subscription fee on top of my IP, Xbox Live, and games!!!!!
cyahzar
Yeah paying to play is a huge deal but I think some of you are missing what really matters...Activision is in the process of killing whatever fan base CoD has left by making it a third person shooter if that is the case. The only 3rd person shooter I can some what play is socom and that was only on the ps2. I had a feeling that when the whole IW thing went down that CoD died but maybe with respawn we will get something great.
Kingslayer28
@Gamerbeing - first off, this model will fail horribly in my opinion, it works with MMO's as i played WoW for years. But to your comment about people not getting live, thats nonsense, people will still pay for live, they will just switch to bad company 2, or halo reach (halo reach is for sure what im gonna be playing for awhile)
3dmunt
Saw this coming from a mile away, its Activision.
Now I'm glad that most of you are saying you wouldn't play it subscription based but considering how many people allow themselves to get ripped of by them already means they'll make a ton of money off it. Besides people said they wouldn't buy MW2 and look what happened there.
EliteMastermind101
RIP COD -_-
XwingVmanX
Yeah I am pretty much done with COD games, expecially if they think I am going to pay. Sorry, but there is a big difference between they way an mmo and a shooter is handled. At this point anyway, I think COD franchise is going to slip back and be over shadowed. Battlefeild Bad Company has already stolen a lot of the spotlight and if the return of Medal of Honor is successful then it will probably take the rest. And then who know what will happen once Respawn releases their game (if it is even a shooter).
On a side note I just realized that Respawn is the first developer I know of that is already so well know in the gaming industry without even releasing a game yet lol
jedimasterchief9
So on top of paying for xbox live per month I have to pay for this game per month. Screw that, I will still to any of the other CoD games (but not 3 that one sucked).
gamerbeing
i really hope that for activisions sake that this doesnt happen...so many people use xbox live for multiplayer FPS'S. the moment that there is a monthily fee(ex. WOW) people will stop getting live. with halo reach comming out i serousily think that people will stop buying live if there was a supscription
Anditswayback321
Well I am done with any future COD games if it requires me paying for a third person noob tubing game. I'll just wait and see what Respawn coming up with for my next first person shooter. Also who gives a crap when Red Dead Redemption is coming out soon!
Displaying 21–32 of 32
112