Videos
(17)Screenshots
(10)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(46)
Videos
(17)Screenshots
(10)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(41)
Videos
(13)Screenshots
(37)Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(11)Screenshots
(37)Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(12)Screenshots
(19)Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(4)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(45)
Videos
(4)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(44)
Videos
(3)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(2)
Videos
(3)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(2)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(2)
Videos
(7)Screenshots
(3)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(13)
Videos
(7)Screenshots
(3)Cheats and Walkthroughs
(15)
Videos
(16)Screenshots
Cheats and Walkthroughs
(64)
Videos
(16)Screenshots
Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(16)Screenshots
Cheats and Walkthroughs
(18)
Videos
(9)Screenshots
Cheats and Walkthroughs
(48)
Videos
(9)Screenshots
Cheats and Walkthroughs
(52)
Videos
(4)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs
Videos
(4)Screenshots
(32)Cheats and Walkthroughs

Somewhere in a secret underground bunker in Washington, D.C., key members of the Department of Justice (Poultry Division) have convened to decide which of our nation's millions of turkeys is to receive the annual White House pardon. In that same spirit of forgiveness, we're going to do the same with one of this year's biggest digital turkeys. This absolutely does not mean that we're forgiving the "winner's" myriad flaws or that we're doing an about-face and recommending it for purchase, just that we can kind of see where they were coming from with it...even if the end result was the equivalent to dropping a frozen turkey in a deep fryer. That is to say: a lesson to be learned by everybody.
This year's candidates are...
WET
You aren't truly terrible, WET. You've got stylish flair, tolerable controls, and Malcom MacDowell, Eliza Dushku, and Alan Cumming. But still selling for $59.99 after mediocre reviews and the promise of superior hack-and-slash games on the horizon? It's like paying more than 50 cents per pound for an off-brand bird. That kind of arrogance can cost you your life...and it just did.

We'll admit it: We were the ones clamoring for a reboot of the Tony Hawk franchise for the past few years. But an overpriced peripheral that can be activated by random passers-by and a game that appears to be completely dumbed-down isn't exactly what we had in mind. We'd send you to the kids table, but you'd still have trouble following the conversation.

To quote Matt Keil's review: "This is largely due to the fact that the base gameplay is essentially Contra post-debilitating brain injury. For the most part, stages can be cleared by simply holding down the right trigger and waiting for everything to die." Sorry, Joe: you're too dumb to live.

This is where it gets interesting. A fight nearly broke out over the internal e-mail thread discussing these final three candidates, and which one was the worst in the best way.
It's always a shame when a developer wastes a golden concept by building truly awful game around it. Such is the case with Darkest of Days, which featured a time-traveling soldier who must restore the proper time line by fighting in the world's most famous wars. Unfortunately, it also featured a litany of debilitating problems that nearly rendered it unplayable. We never liked dark meat, anyway.

Similar to WET, Wanted: Weapons of Fate has got some style...but not enough to compensate for its 4-hour running time and full price tag. It probably would have been better served as a download-only game, but even then, the near lack of challenge still wouldn't justify the investment.

Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard
Darkest of Days shares the award for "best concept, worst execution" with this spoof of the video game industry's most treasured cliches. They got the humor part down -- having Arrested Development/30 Rock's Will Arnett helps -- but whiffed on pretty much everything else. The joke is stretched too thinly over repetitive, bland gameplay and mechanics that were poorly executed.

HOWEVER! The idea is still a really good one, as there are too few games that are genuinely funny and self-aware. That there's a sequel coming in the form of Blood Bath and Beyond hopefully means the developer has learned some lessons about actual game design...you know, the real reasons we play these things in the first place.
So congratulations, Eat Lead: The Return of Matt Hazard...you are this year's best terrible game! You are hereby pardoned for crimes against interactive entertainment, and may continue your existence in equal measure of hope and shame.




Comments
Displaying 1–20 of 25
122
Tmidiman
Wet would be worth it if the price were lower. It's a good game at $40 and by the time it gets there is will only be worth $30 and so forth.
RandyMercer
WET wasn't as good as Mirror's Edge, not even close. Too me it was bad gameplay, bad quicktime controls, granted I only played the demo but that was enough. Oh G.I. Joe what were the developers thinking, answer not at all, and a $60 price tag wth? iI knew Darkest of Days would suck, I compared to Dynasty warriors idk how, but there you go. Weapons of Fate, Ohhh Weapons of Fate, well thats enough of that. Oha and Eat Lead? Whats that?
kookie_munster
kill em all, let god sort them out!!!!
StillFree23
WET is like this years Mirror's Edge. Good game play but's just too damn short and it's not worth the $60.00
MasterNoble6
you people might be on meth or just blind if you thought wet was a game you should spend your hard earned money on. no offense to the blind if your brailing this
SmashBro722
WET was pretty cool, and you know it. Still, I played the Darkest of Days demo, and it wasn't half bad. In a way, I think it was the best \"historical\" game I've ever played, but all I can say is that something about historical games equals disaster. But, anything else really was a major disappointment. Why Eat Lead, anyway?
Kerbe360
I thought WET was a fun game to play... though it took a little getting use to. I agree with the majority here. Save WET... burn the rest. I got a special spot reserved for GI JOE in Donte's Inferno.
Keine_Lust
WET not that bad of a game.
Warrior567
when i heard the gi joe review i busted out laughing
SavageHunter
"Its a game." - Gus Sorola when talking about WET
fpsjoe
hmm apperently I was the only one who actually liked Darkest of Days. Yes some of the levels were frustraiting (zeppelin level) but I feel that this will be an undergroud classic someday. I'll hold on to my copy no matter what people say about it I still enjoyed it.
gravy666
Eat Lead sounds funny to me. For some reason I have the urge to rent it regardless of the horrible reviews it got just so I can get a few laughs.
Juicelee
there is hope for wet if they fixed the controls and tweaked the physics a bit you'd have a game that would be a surefire contender
rosie314
Wet needs to be saved
GreedyMcNasty
Andrew come on man. You are just making me look at all the bad games I played this past year. Some of them I thought were pretty good. Wet noooooooooooooooooooo! Matt Hazard YES! When it comes down to games I like to dabble in a little of this and a little of that, I will always be a fighting game fan first.
Play a hour or two of wet then put in a 6 hour sit down of street fighter 4. Happy thanks giving!
ultra man 38
me to i play the demo. ok -of a rental, but of a buy-mmm not.
rjs927
I rented WET and I really liked it. It had its flaws but is great as a rental. Of course when I was done with it I never really had any interest in playing it again so I was glad I didn't buy it. So, if you are interested, rent it. If you REALLY like it then go ahead and buy it, but I doubt you will.
DaFrEaKzO
Is WET really as bad as people are leading me to believe? I have the demo and enjoy playing it occasionally.
celestialove03
Pardon Eat Lead
Hoss70
I thought WET was a great game. I beat it in fact, even though, yes, the controls were wonky alot of the time. But it was still a good mindless romp for me. As for the rest of the games....not so much.
Displaying 1–20 of 25
122
Add a Comment