X

Michael Pachter Predicts Xbox Live Price Hike

JGaskill
70 Comments

Posted October 20, 2009 - By Jake Gaskill

Xbox LiveHow much is Microsoft’s Xbox Live service worth to you? Actually, let me put that another way: What are you willing to pay to play Xbox 360 games online, stream Netflix, (soon) check out your Facebook page on your TV, and take advantage of all the other services Live provides? Because if gaming prognosticator Michael Pachter ends up being right, you will have to decide how much you value the service sooner rather than later, because a price hike could be on the way.

Speaking with GameTrailers, Pachter explained that Microsoft is making a serious push to turn PC gamers into 360 players, by giving PC gamers “an incentive to buy a 360” by “[putting] something that he really wants only on the 360." As a result of this push, these gamers, especially those who are multiplayer-focused, will ultimately have no choice but to, “pay [Microsoft] 50 bucks a year so that in a couple years, it’s 100 bucks a year. And that’s going up. We all know that.”

While it will probably irk many gamers to have to fork over an extra $50 (or whatever it ends up being) per year for Xbox Live service, by the time the hike comes (if it does at all), chances are Live will be more robust and feature-packed than ever, thereby justifying the price. If Microsoft jacked the prices after the newest 360 update is released, it would be a much harder case to make. Of course, if it’s not going to be happening for a while, it’s simply too early to tell anyway whether it would be worth the extra money or not, but I have a feeling that won't stop plenty of people from forcefully voicing their opinions on this matter.

So, how much is Xbox Live worth to you? If you think a price hike is inevitable, what do you think the next price point will be?

Source

Michael Pachter Predicts Xbox Live Price Hike
http://www.g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/700070/michael-pachter-predicts-xbox-live-price-hike/
http://files.g4tv.com/ImageDb3/135111_S/Xbox-Live.jpg
BlogThread_700070
  • deadclownin

    lets see isnt microsoft ahem i mean bill gates making tons of money off the 7 bucks a month 50 bucks a year gold service considering theres what like 2or3 million or more xbox live gold subcribers why mess with that because once the hike kicks in guess what subscriber will click on the downgrade to silver button and leave it at that

    Posted: October 25, 2009 8:12 PM | Reply | Report
  • Asrugan

    This from the same guy who's predicting Natal to be 50 bucks? Yeah, I'm not buyin this guy's line.

    Posted: October 25, 2009 10:26 AM | Reply | Report
  • yogiboy789

    well if the next update comes and they increased the price before modern warfare 2 im going to gamestop and changing my pre-order to the ps3 because i don't plan on paying $100 a year

    Posted: October 21, 2009 3:04 PM | Reply | Report
    yogiboy789
  • Mr.Rager

    I'd wipe the dust off my PS3 and start playing Uncharted 2 more. Sorry, Chief

    Posted: October 21, 2009 12:10 PM | Reply | Report
    Mr.Rager
  • almypal

    Any sort of Price increase and I'm gone

    Posted: October 21, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply | Report
    almypal
  • WestDaniel

    First off, all of this is speculation. Second, Microsoft is, believe it or not, a business, which means they are in it to make money. However, they generally do a good job of provide quality for their services, and don't try to alienate their customers. They don't have the cleanest record, but they do listen to feedback on their business practices, and most newer models are much more reliable than the older units. I for one believe that paying for live is justifiable, but to an extent, but I'm not willing to trade it in over something so silly as a live price hike, I'm still going to buy 360 games and software, I just won't be buying live.

    Finally, no one is forcing you to buy this, but it isn't 100 dollars, and depending on how the economy is, even they will realize that at tough times no one pay that much. I don't feel paying for live is too much, because the quality is infinitely better than the PSN, but perhaps if anything, a price drop on year subscriptions would be a much better idea. Drop it to 40 or 30 dollars and I'm a customer for life.

    Posted: October 21, 2009 8:17 AM | Reply | Report
    WestDaniel
  • Boghound

    Typical M$.

    Posted: October 21, 2009 2:33 AM | Reply | Report
    Boghound
  • vismortis

    That may chase people away, if they use the social networking and movies as a reason to hike the price there is a chance that will push people to the PS3 (even more so now that the price is $ for $) What I could see happening is one price point for people that just want access to the marketplace and to play the games and another price for the movies and social networking MS i think knows that there is a large section of gamers that will NEVER use many of the items outside game DLC friend list voice chat and playing the games. some may use the twiter junk but let them pay more for it.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 9:03 PM | Reply | Report
    vismortis
  • CDAT1AD

    CDAT1AD's comment is abusive and has been removed.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 6:46 PM | Reply | Report
    CDAT1AD
  • Jimi0088

    PSN sucks on chiefs salty balls. Live is worth the 50 but I don't know about 100. I don't need twitter, facebook and all that crap. So if they do hike the price then I want an option that limits my features but is less in price.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 6:23 PM | Reply | Report
    Jimi0088
  • XwingVmanX

    I still can't believe people pay $50 a year for XBL, in the end they end up paying more for their Xbox then if they had bought a ps3 at 599.99. Then they try to say that XBL is better because they pay for when i doubt they haven even tried the PSN and if they did it was at a friends house where they picked it apart to feel better about their choice. Now I haven't tried XBL so I don't know which is better all I know is that I don't have any problems with PSN and I don't have to pay for it. Win win for me.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 5:59 PM | Reply | Report
    XwingVmanX
  • pmc_soap

    after reading the comments i feel better and agree with blue vortex all the wa i was mad becus thats wat i thought they were doing until this

    Posted: October 20, 2009 5:59 PM | Reply | Report
    pmc_soap
  • pmc_soap

    well i disagree with patcher becus online multiplayer for most computer games is free so to appeal to them they must make xbl free with a 30 dollar year fee or somethin for netflix and facebook or twitter they will lose so much revenue if they rise the price some1 needs to tell them if that is wat they are intending to do if it is 100 bux later on im gettin a ps3 or getting a better pc to play video games cus it would be so retarded if they charge 100 dollars if ps3 dropped there price psn is free with wifi built especially when they already said netflix facebook and twitter were privlages for paying a fee i would downgrade to silver and throw away my xbox but i doubt that would happen

    Posted: October 20, 2009 5:49 PM | Reply | Report
    pmc_soap
  • Plasma_Cake

    I don't think this is going to happen, I'm probably buying a PS3 if it goes over 12 dollars a month. WE ARE SUPPOSE TO MAKE XBOX LIVE CHEAPER, NOT MORE.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 5:46 PM | Reply | Report
    Plasma_Cake
  • mp1289

    Im sure xbox live is worth something, but all this stuff can be obtained for free elsewhere. Pulling up the price could have some catastrophic results for them.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 5:15 PM | Reply | Report
    mp1289
  • PS3fears360

    Looks like the Delaystation Nation believes everything they read on the internet. I doubt this is true.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 4:39 PM | Reply | Report
    PS3fears360
  • Zmeeds

    lulz

    Posted: October 20, 2009 4:05 PM | Reply | Report
    Zmeeds
  • Blue_Vortex

    Actually I think the point of adding all these features is to justify why it cost 50 a year. I doubt Microsoft could obtain the PC gamer by charging 100 and I'm pretty sure Microsoft knows this.

    Posted: October 20, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Report
    Blue_Vortex
  • JohnnyBuku

    Oh No - some stupid analyst that somehow has become semi-famous for pulling game related predictions out of his a$$ has proclaimed that XBL may double in price and all of the $onyboys are ganging up on the poor xbots who are starting a slow panic (i think i can smell burning buildings close by). Time to dig our bunkers and drink our koolaid (in that order).

    Really folks (safe to uncurl from the fetal position) M$ has to realize that it needs to LOWER or ELIMINATE the fee not raise it. Proof? Why would they lower it to $40 and than raise it to $100? I predict a lwering or elimination of the fee within the year UNLESS $ony starts charging for PSN (now there is reason to turn over some cars or something).

    Remember: M$ loves you and wants you to grow into solid consumers, and please turn your webcam back on so they can see what you are doing...

    Posted: October 20, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Report
    JohnnyBuku
  • BlueRectangleOfLife

    I for one would start using my ps3 more...

    Posted: October 20, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Report
    BlueRectangleOfLife

Add a Comment

Limit 5,000 characters | 5,000 characters remaining
Log in to Comment
Post to Facebook
Post to Facebook

ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Tags

g4tv.com

AdChoices