Search

This site requires that JavaScript be enabled and the Flash plug-in be installed. If you already have Macromedia Flash Player 8 installed, then you may continue browsing the site.

TheFeed

ESA Urges Mass. Gamers To Stand Together

Posted by Justin Fassino - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:14 AM

Get to know Massachusetts bill HB 1423. It's the newest in a long line of anti-video game propositions that would seek to restrict or outright ban the sale of video games that depict violence unless the buyer is over 18. The bill seeks to categorize this type of video game as equivalent to pornography by arguing that violent games lack any sort of artistic merit and/or are insensible to community standards.

In response to this proposed law, the Video Game Voters Network and the Entertainment Software Association are urging gamers in the state of Massachusetts to take a stand against this bill by submitting a letter to their representative stating their opposition to drafting the bill into law. If you're not a resident of Massachusetts there's no need to weigh in on this with your local government just yet, so for now just continue to fight the good fight on all things related to you.

So far legal precedent has favored the video game industry by declaring all previous bills of the same type as unconstitutional, with judges making the point that video games, just like any other form of media, will be protected under the First Amendment.

The VGVN and ESA contacted X-Play to also point out that the ESRB rating system that every game follows is a perfectly satisfactory for informing consumers of in-game content they might find questionable, leaving the responsibility of moderating video game habits up to parents and buyers and not the government.

"Massachusetts deserves better," said RIch Taylor, Senior VP for Communications at the ESA. "The proposed legislation ignores the unbroken chain of circuit court rulings and other decisions that already determined similar laws were unconstitutional. 

"However, we maintain a deep level of respect for his and Massachusetts legislators’ concerns. We know that with the ESRB ratings, parental education, and the parental controls available on all new video game consoles, there are myriad ways that those concerned can ensure that children play appropriate, parent-approved computer and video games. We stand ready to work cooperatively to increase parental awareness and usage of these critical tools.”

We here at X-Play and The Feed love hearing an organization take a strong position in defending the rights of people who love and enjoy video games. It doesn't happen often enough...


Comment(s)


Posted by rIMu - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:44 AM
stand up for your rights my gaming brethren in Massachusetts

Posted by Wikipedia - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:49 AM
I'm trying to understand the parenting of my generation(not my own parents, looking at other examples, I've fared pretty well) and the upcoming generations to get a grasp on their bizarre pattern of dominance and disconnect, and find it hard to believe that with the rise of so called 'helicopter' parents that the government still needs to spend tax money on enforcing acts that retailers would probably ignore.

Why, if these parents, I note that the article does not mention any specific group lobbying the Mass. Bill, really give a flipping fry about their children, does it make it any sense to have a bill that again pushes the child away at arms length?

Are these people really that afraid of opening the door to violence or even facing a child's curiosity about death?

This government supported pacifying of our society is sick, and everyone should be ashamed of it.

Posted by Megagents - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:26 AM
This is quite troubling. I can understand not selling to a M-rated or above game to a kid but not something as random as "depicting violence".

Posted by Megagents - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:28 AM
This is quite troubling. I can understand not selling to a M-rated or above game to a kid but not something as random as "depicting violence".

Posted by Soulself - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:35 AM
You know what will happen if this law passes? NOTHING! Crime rates are not going to go down, teenagers aren't going to start loving and listening to their parents, there won't be any change except for a bunch of pissed off gamers.

Posted by hetman - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:35 AM
I dunno. If you are not 18 you shouldnt be able to buy certain violent video games. If just for the fact that it makes my life easier. And when a violent game comes out we will not have to hear but it made my kid go crazy and shoot up his school. We can say will your kid should not have even been playing that game so it is you who is the bad parent no one else.

Posted by lightknight77 - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:23 AM
Why do they have respect for the MA legal system? A petition was submitted (it doesn't matter what for) recently that was recognized as legitimate and should therefore have been put on ballots for the majority to vote on. The MA house and Senate refused to allow it even though it was the peoples' consitutional right and the MA courts even decided in the peoples' favor. Still, they have never allowed it to make the ballot. The MA legislative branch is not for the democracy of the people in their state, they are blatantly for themselves. An elected monarchy who refused to let the majority even try to be heard.

Screw massachusetts in their tiny holes. (the issue may have been about gay marriage, but in a democracy it doesn't matter what the issue is, the majority is supposed to have their way. We have to defend the people's right to a voice or numerous more important things could be denied voice)
Advertisement

Posted by anonomousperson - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:32 AM
I would feel completely ashamed if I was a parent. These people who are pushing for this do not deserve to be called parents. They claim to be looking out for the next generation of kids and keep them from the atrocities of this world. Why have they ignored movies? Why have they ignored the news broadcasting the war, rape and murder? Kids are curious about these things from day one. Thats why they play fight and play kill. If you make the child feel bad for those feelings rather than let him explore them and teach him what is a good thought and what is a bad thought, then you create the sociopaths. Kids need to be taught the right way and wrong way. This right here is the wrong way. Next generation will see more killings if things like this pass.

Posted by SkullOne360 - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 11:55 AM
I think parents of this generation need to for once, PICK UP A DAMN WEBSTER'S DICTIONARY AND LOOK UP THE DAMN MEANING OF PARENT! Do your damn jobs and stop making video games and every other media format that you for not one minute that the time to comtemplate and make it your scapegoat. I wonder what the other parents think of this.

Posted by gamer_rage - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 12:18 PM
@skullone, i agree with that, as parents and i've become one, its on us to monitor our children in what they watch, play, etc. parents need to take accountability and stop blaming everything else for their stupidity, cause maybe just maybe if parents did their focken job we wouldn't be having this conversation, so to all other parents shove that ego up your a$$ and look at yourselfs for a change

Posted by rocketwolf - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:03 PM
I'm sorry but the only reason for laws like this are for parents that don't/won't do thier jobs as parents be it work or otherwise that keeps them from being parents that listen/pay attention/ and try to BE WITH thier kids. The more the governments are involved the less the parents themselves have to be.[This doesn't go to all parents, mine and quite a few I know how to balance what's needed and still keep a good firm eye on kids as well as learn what they're doing to make a just decision no matter the crying.]

Posted by callofdutyshooter - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:05 PM
thats so useless haveing to be over 18 most of the scholl shooters are over 18 and thats the only thing there trying to stop

Posted by Xsi9mm - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:13 PM
ahaha i dont care i just care either way im an adult so who cares plus there are benefits like you wont have any annoying kids on your cod 4 servers or counter strike or what have you :D
Advertisement

Posted by yoshiarecool - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:15 PM
The point is, no matter what they pass it will be beat down by the First Amendment

Posted by Xsi9mm - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:17 PM
whoops that didnt make sense i mean i dont care either way. as long as the little bastards dont get there hands on the ultra violent games which is the parents responsibilty and the game providers responsibilty. if they see a little kid come in and ask for manhunt 2 they shouldnt go oh sure hang on a sec we just got that in. But other then that i dont care if little kids are whining because it works out better for me i dont have to have a head ache every time i try to have a decent game of call of duty 4 or what have you.

Posted by yoda321 - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 2:46 PM
this is like a bill that the former gov. of New York would purpose, and look what happended to him. People forget that art is subject to opinion. Who are we to tell other people to live there lives, when we areselves have our own problems. Don't jugde your brother untill you take the thorn out of your eye.

Posted by Resenik - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:04 PM
Parents need to make sure they do their job as parents and make sure that what their children do is safe. If they think that their kid playing a violent games inst safe then they need to take action and make sure that their kid doesnt buy that game. This bill will just make the more mature gamers in Mass. pissed off becuase their a year or two younger than the age limit. Besides, we all know that they'll find a way to get around it just like druggies and underage drinkers and smokers. I think the bill should be dropped...or radically changed.

Posted by Resenik - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:06 PM
Coninued--

Besides, what game arent 'violent' anymore? Not a lot. Hell, even Lego games are semi-violent.

Posted by coldfire28 - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:24 PM
WTF i live in Mass.

Posted by hightall - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:44 PM
all i can say is funk mass coldfire28 stand up and screw them

Posted by rIMu - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 6:44 PM
stand up for your rights my gaming brethren in Massachusetts

Posted by TopNerdJR - Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:37 PM
What i dont understand is that first off it does deal with the first ammendment rights and would so violate them, second off if they do this to a video game they might as well do that to r rated movies. and 3rd is that all that does is move the buying age of M rated games up a year. they shouldnt spend money on something useless as this bill. they need to spend it, if any, on looking into consumers and asking why are they selling them to under age kids or looking into why parents are being responcible with my kids. this bill is just a waste of money and time.

Posted by dougdangger - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:03 AM
This is what happens when our corrupt politicians get bored or would like to draw attention away for some crap that's going on.

Most gamers nowadays are people over 20 years old since the average zit faced teen ager can't afford a $400 console with games that cost $60.

It's funny how politicians give us lectures about morality when they are the most corrupt vermins who use our tax dollars for their sexual needs.

Go figure.

Posted by dougdangger - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 12:11 AM
Growing up I played Street Fighter and Mortal Kombat, I didn't rip someone's heart out of their chest.

I watched GI Joe, Johnny Quest, Transformers... cartoons that used guns, I never shot anyone.

I've been firing guns in a shooting range since I was 14, noever shot anyone.

I bought my first rifle when I turned 18, I never shot anyone.

I have half a dozen fire arms... never went on a shooting spree.

I am well trained in martial arts, never had to use it other than "self defense".


Yet I grew up fine, never been arrested, no drugs, no tickets... nothing.

I think my parents did a heck of a job. And yes, they too had multiple jobs and we lived in the ghetto where some people shot one another for sport, until we became successful and moved out. We made it without handsouts.

Posted by Tactless_Ninja - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 2:58 AM
HA! Live in Mass. and I was reading a newspaper there too :o Anyways, there was the paper, and what stood out was some mention of raping women, and AO games being sold. Now, I have not heard of any game in which "rape" was a gameplay feature, nor have I ever seen an AO game. Can someone please mail a mooninite to their office? This is just stupid. :\

Posted by SGAanubisSG1 - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:37 AM
Liberals and there wanting to ban guns and violent media items. Why can't they just stay out of other peoples lives...damn hippies.

Posted by ScorpionX20 - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 7:59 AM
Damn straight it is protected under the First Amendment, just like other media a person under 18 can watch rated R movie or porno if they wanted to regardless of what anyone says.

P.S.
Violence/Sex is what makes the world go round and the way it is today.

Posted by jeremy_speedy - Wednesday, March 19, 2008 10:53 PM
this is another attemp for the gov. to do the parents job just like the rest of the country wnats to go far and be someone in life but someone else to do all the hard work to get there for them if the parents watched their kids closer they would have to do things like this the gov. should put all this effort in to getting parents aware of the ESRB rating it gives a rating and tells why it got rating like some viloce or strong language. but no matter if they trdo pass it kids will find their ways around it just like drugs, alcohol, and porn.

You must Login or Register to post.