Scumbag criminals Kane and Lynch reunite for what was supposed to be a simple arms deal in Shanghai. The new shaky-cam presentation adds to the overall emphasis on "grittiness" and realism, though little else in Dog Days benefits from the same sort of inspired choices. A thoroughly enjoyable but short ride, by Dogs Days's end you will believe this much: Kane and Lynch sure do love shooting up Chinese guys.
The Pros
- Multiplayer modes play to your devious, mistrustful nature
- Tons of intense firefights in exotic and gorgeous (and highly destructible) locales
- Unusual (and optional) shaky-cam presentation greatly enhances the overall realism
The Cons
- Story mode is unforgivably short
- Almost no boss battles
- Core mechanics adamantly refuse to evolve or present new challenges
EDITOR’S NOTE: This game inadvertently was posted with a “4 out of 5” score due to an unfortunate technical error. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused.
Over the past year or so, a few great games have come from franchises considerably into their lifespan and these titles have made nonbelievers suddenly take notice. For example, with Splinter Cell, it was the fifth game—Conviction--that turned heads. Now, Kane & Lynch 2: Dog Days, a gritty third-person cover-based shooter has managed to grab headlines, curiously, with its low-grade YouTube-like crappy video compression of an extremely shaky surveillance video. Supposedly trailing the titular duo as they attempt to escape the streets of Shanghai in the 48 hours after a simple arms deal goes horribly awry, the buffering-video presentation is suspiciously contrarian in an era when many gamers are playing on high-definition TVs; however, the presentation quickly takes a back seat to the thrilling, yet repetitive, run-and-gun action.
Get To The Chopper!
More than anything, Kane & Lynch 2 strives to feel like an action movie of the more plausible variety—think more True Lies than Live Free Or Die Hard—and it serves the game well. It comes across in the “mature” cuss-laden dialogue, and especially in the sublime set pieces that you’ll fight tooth and nail in and then subsequently riddle with bullets. From the neon glow of the Chinese storefronts and DVD stores in malls to construction sites and an airport, the AI challenges you at every step to never back down. You’ll easily be gunned down if you’re too stubborn to take cover or if you get so frustrated you charge ahead, red faced, without clearing a path. Patient progression is usually the best approach, that and always keeping an eye out for snipers.
However, that extra degree of realism has its drawbacks. For one, there’s only one enemy that could be considered a boss: a la True Lies, you and Kane face down a chopper while making your way through a skyscraper. While you eventually get automatic weapons, the enemies you face don’t really change up. Get used to blasting the same basic enemy solider in different clothes throughout. Eventually, there are attack dogs to euthanize, but that’s about it. The difficulty never really ratchets up ever, either, making an exciting, but one-note ride.
So Happy Together
The main story is short. We’re talking not just beatable in a rental, but beatable in an afternoon. There’s a wide variety of reasons to play through the game again in co-op (you can be revived when downed, enemies you killed will stay that way after respawning), but once the credits roll a lot of emphasis is placed on the multiplayer modes, which, unfortunately, are very enjoyable, but as limited as the main experience.
Fragile Alliance mode returns, but the true stars of the online experience are the Heist and Undercover Cop modes. In both, you have to steal wads of filthy sweaty cash and be the sole survivor who makes a clean escape either via helicopter (in Heist) or in a getaway car (in Undercover Cop), unless you’re the undercover cop who has to keep up appearances until he can find a way to isolate and eliminate all the other criminals. What makes these modes such standouts is how they play to your suspicions and paranoia. In Heist, you can choose to kill some of your comrades, but only if you think you can escape alive. In the Undercover Cop, if you try to kill someone who isn’t the cop, all your allies will be alerted that you’re a traitor, and they’ll kill you. Trust no one—you’ll live longer.
As Bad As They Wanna Be
To the untrained eye, Dog Days is no different than any other game that transforms you into a walking gun cabinet and gives you tons of meat with legs to shoot at. And in a way that’s true, but its defiant allegiance to realism, vibrant setting, an unusual reality-show-like camera all make it a worthy purchase (after picking up the requisite Dramamine).











Comments
Displaying 1–20 of 27
122
SLANG369
Being a police officer when I play video games I tend to have my characters with good and moral standings. The wanderer in Fallout 3 I play with good karma and in Red Dead Redemption John Marston I played with good standing. However with Kane and Lynch it was so GOOD to be BAD. The problem with Kane and Lynch though is that it has some issues were with the controls and the story mode can be a bit repetitious with each level. Though I like the concept of the shaky cam which was cool to me, most people cut the shaky cam off. However the saving grace on this game is the multiplayer. I love playing Fragile Alliance, Under Cover Cop Mode, Cops and Robbers, Arcade and Co Op. I love the fact that in Fragile Alliance you don't know if you online teammate will betray the group or not and when you die you respawn as a cop. In Under Cover Cop it also tests your trust with your teammates. If I were to rate this game it would be 5 out of 5 just for the multiplayer but 3 out of 5 for the story mode and that's just for the shaky cam.
InhumaneSociety
Yet again another game that was beat down by x-play
XxTimmyxX1
i dont get this game i really never heard ppl talk about this game the only ppl i heard talk bout it was ROOSTERTEETH on youtube.com
mrkbizzle
hah hah, i told these mofo's when this game comes out it would suck! im glad they spend their 50+ bux on it. serves em right, im just not sure that it's cool that the game company is makin' any kind of money on this b.s. game. Do not buy this game. It's trash! Even if you are a gamer who gives a lot of poor reviewed games the benefit of the doubt. There is nothing here. Unless you have a modded xbox and can burn this then please see what i'm talking about please. Maybe these cheap bastards will take a hint and make something worth playing. Until then do not give these dudes' your hard earned cash. They need to learn. Crappy overall game, equals eat crap. I would not even be this harsh but they deserve it for not even adding anything new to their game play, and even worse to the industry of shooter games as a whole. I cannot even believe it got a 3. Im glad g4 made a mistake and put three in the review score instead of the 4 it read a few days ago. I was pissed. G4 and alot of other gaming sites need to check themselves as well. It seems as if they work in tandem with these game companies to get people to buy their software. I cannot say anything else, but sometimes it seems as if they do. I like g4's reviews most of the time but sometimes they baffle me. 1 or maybe 2 out of 5. Cmon G4. GET REAL!
mrkbizzle
hah hah, i told these mofo's when this game comes out it would suck! im glad they spend their 50+ bux on it. serves em right, im just not sure that it's cool that the game company is makin' any kind of money on this b.s. game. Do not buy this game. It's trash! Even if you are a gamer who gives a lot of poor reviewed games the benefit of the doubt. There is nothing here. Unless you have a modded xbox and can burn this then please see what i'm talking about please. Maybe these cheap bastards will take a hint and make something worth playing. Until then do not give these dudes' your hard earned cash. They need to learn. Crappy overall game, equals eat crap. I would not even be this harsh but they deserve it for not even adding anything new to their game play, and even worse to the industry of shooter games as a whole. I cannot even believe it got a 3. Im glad g4 made a mistake and put three in the review score instead of the 4 it read a few days ago. I was pissed. G4 and alot of other gaming sites need to check themselves as well. It seems as if they work in tandem with these game companies to get people to buy their software. I cannot say anything else, but sometimes it seems as if they do. I like g4's reviews most of the time but sometimes they baffle me. 1 or maybe 2 out of 5. Cmon G4. GET REAL!
Nala
i didnt like this game
EddieTHead
Am I crazy but didn't this get a 4/5 when the review first went up?
crocodilius
WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU EIDOS....
I'm sorry, I just miss classic tomb raider where you unlock doors with hidden keys and relics you find, rather than swinging around on a magnetic crapple...so, so...sorry..
Sablicious
Great atmosphere and gameplay feel, but not enough content.
A shooter for adults - rent or bargain bin purchase.
chris0824
i went and bought kane and lynch 2 when g4 rated it a 4 out of 5 and then looked back after i bought it and saw they changed it. i agree more with the 3, anyways
slimmer
Kevin on aots said it made him woozy , it's because the FOV in almost all games suck.
I literally could not play F.E.A.R. on my 360 because it made me dizzy but on my PC I didn't have a problem especially after fixing the fov with some PC moding.
brotherali
its game is not good i pre order and beat it the on day one the co op is okay but its not worth 60 bucks. im trade it in for mafia 2. 2 out of 5
StuntDouble2483
I'm not entirely sure True Lies was the best example of a "plausible" action movie. From what I've seen I'm thinking more along the lines of Michael Mann's Collateral or Miami Vice.
spicypooptastic
People people 4/5 is not a good score, 4/5 means pure garbage worthless game! Anything under a 5 means its not worth a penny
lowkevmic
I don't know why everyone is surprised that this game got a 3 out of 5. It's not like the first Kane and Lynch was a innovative step forward in the world of gaming either. They are both two shooting games, that uses their extremely R-Rated story plot to grab the attention of the gamer. But once you sit down and actually play the game, just like the first one, you'll realize real quick that the story is pretty much the bread and butter of this game. If it wasn't for the graphic violence, the language, and the idea that you're in control of two crazy criminals straight out of the mind of some Quintin Tarentino inspired writer. Then it's just an okay gaming experience. A 3/5 is a very fair score.
gouki23
wow i was expecting more than a 3
ImprobabilityZero
This looks like a game to worth having a look at, though seems like I won't be in any rush to grab it. Bets on if DLC's will come out to add more 'meat' to the game?
From what I'm reading from this review, it's not saying its terrible. I assume the story isn't bad, and with the vocal talents, I would say the voice acting would be pretty good too. Just that the game needed more to it, and a little more variety. 3/5 is the opinion of the reviewer. I don't understand the comments of "it should've been .../5". No. YOU would've rated it whatever rating, but its in the opinion of the reviewer that its 3/5. Which by no means is bad. Just that its a 'neither here nor there' game. Probably a 'more fun than it is good' type game.
The 'no boss' comment is interesting because it has been frequently debated as to whether a game really needs a boss of sorts (or at least an end game one). Without knowing how the narrative of the game goes, I don't know.
For those that have played it though, is the story any good, and do you think it could've been stretched on for longer?
Malapropism
i feel weird when games are given high scores due to their multiplayer aspect, because i think of playing video games as a solo experience, i just don't feel like 45 dollars a year is worth playing with someone else, because typically when i want to play video games with someone else, i want them in the same room as me, so i can actually socialize with them, but this is a debate about multiplayer, not the game, i don't see why games should be redeemed for multiplayer, because multiplayer requires another human being, the designers made a boring game, and the only way it gets better is if 2 people are playing it, i find that rather ludicrous
nowhatsgud
The turtle must have walked on the line between 3 and 4. They couldn't tell until the instant replay.
marcusdjackson
looks like i'll stay away. far far away!
Displaying 1–20 of 27
122
Add a Comment