Saw: The Videogame Review - PS3

The Saw film series isn't exactly known for its subtlety. Rather, it's about ingenious traps and devices that cause pain and gore, ostensibly to pressure characters into improving their lives, but really just to thrill the audience. The setup should work for gaming, especially when all the action is set in a seriously run-down mental asylum. But in playable form, Saw: The Videogame spends so much time maintaining tension that there's never any real release or payoff, and the experience feels like one very long flatline.

Are You the Keymaster?

You're Detective Tapp, last seen as incarnated by Danny Glover in the original film. Tapp awakens within the bowels of a hideously decaying asylum, only to be told by Jigsaw (via an array of TVs, as is the puppetmaster's M.O.) that a key is implanted within his chest. Problem is, there are a whole bunch of other loons also trapped in the asylum, and they all need that key to unlock their freedom. Jigsaw doesn't kill people so much as provide them, or others, with the means to their demise.

So Tapp is told to find and rescue a handful of people related to his history while avoiding the aggressive other “inmates” who want to crack him like a walnut to get that key. From there, Saw proceeds very much like a simplified version of the first film. Tapp will contend with traps large and small, ranging from a simple shotgun rigged to blow his head off after opening a door, to a swinging industrial axe blade threatening to cleave another cop in two.

You'll meet a few familiar characters, and the script assumes a pretty thorough memory of their stories as they appear on film. There's enough context in-game that non-fans won't be totally lost, but only just enough. The main element that keeps this experience feeling like the films is the voice of Tobin Bell, who played Jigsaw in the movies and effectively reprises his role here.

Would You Like the Lead Pipe, or Spiky Baseball Bat?

Less intrinsic to the cinema Saw equation, but a lot more essential to the game, is combat. That's where things really break down, but not in the way that Jigsaw might appreciate. Saw's fights recall the encounters in Condemned, but they're a lot less effective. Tapp's movements are molasses slow -- the guy is in really bad shape-- but there isn't a sense of weight or movement, only the floaty, slow feeling that you're not really hitting anything. And regardless of Tapp's condition there's no reason that his strikes should be so sluggish. He's wounded, not drunk.

The controls are slothful throughout the game -- again, arguably justifiable thanks to Tapp's debilitated physical condition -- but in combat they simply become infuriating. While strikes are absurdly slow, the block/dodge move is frequently ineffectual, and the enemy AI is never smart enough to make a win feel like an achievement.

The best kills come when you're able to re-rig a trap you previously disarmed in order to take out a rushing goon. But here the controls are a downside, too. If you've got to race back through a doorway, turn, close and bolt it to slow an enemy before re-setting a trap, good luck. Imprecise controls are a killer. If it seemed more like they were meant to reflect Tapp's physical state, that might be acceptable. Unfortunately, the commands just feel unreliable, period.

Try to Find the Pulse

Saw: The Videogame is creepy, yes, and the mental asylum is actually quite well designed and accurate -- don't ask how I know that. Fans of the film series will definitely dig on the frequent nods back to kills and situations from the five movies. But it doesn't take very long before Saw starts to feel like the same handful of puzzle pieces are being shuffled around over and over. That's just tiring, not frightening.